RTX A2000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.31no data
Power efficiency3.39no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK104GA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date3 May 2012 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072 ×22560
Core clock speed915 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speed1019 MHz1207 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate130.4 ×296.56
Floating-point processing power3.13 TFLOPS ×26.18 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×248
TMUs128 ×280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache128 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 ×24 GB
Memory bus width512-bit (256-bit per GPU) ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s ×2176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMIYes (via dongle)-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 May 2012 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 95 Watt

RTX A2000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 216% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 690 and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 690 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 223 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 690 or RTX A2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.