UHD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 680MX and UHD Graphics P630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
680MX outperforms Graphics P630 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 536 | 657 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.79 | 30.55 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | no data | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 24 May 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3540 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 28.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.4608 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 3 |
| TMUs | no data | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 55
+57.1%
| 35−40
−57.1%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+69%
|
27−30
−69%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+64%
|
24−27
−64%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+69%
|
27−30
−69%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+57.9%
|
18−20
−57.9%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+52.8%
|
35−40
−52.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+64.7%
|
16−18
−64.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+50%
|
21−24
−50%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+29.4%
|
65−70
−29.4%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+64%
|
24−27
−64%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+69%
|
27−30
−69%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+41.4%
|
95−100
−41.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+36.7%
|
45−50
−36.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+57.9%
|
18−20
−57.9%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+52.8%
|
35−40
−52.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+64.7%
|
16−18
−64.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+61.9%
|
21−24
−61.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+63.6%
|
10−12
−63.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+50%
|
21−24
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
+62.5%
|
16−18
−62.5%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+29.4%
|
65−70
−29.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+64%
|
24−27
−64%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+36.7%
|
45−50
−36.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+57.9%
|
18−20
−57.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+50%
|
21−24
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+29.4%
|
65−70
−29.4%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
+52.8%
|
35−40
−52.8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+52.2%
|
45−50
−52.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+100%
|
5−6
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+26.3%
|
35−40
−26.3%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+51.7%
|
60−65
−51.7%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+144%
|
9−10
−144%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+72.7%
|
10−12
−72.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+64%
|
24−27
−64%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+61.9%
|
21−24
−61.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
This is how GTX 680MX and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:
- GTX 680MX is 57% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 680MX is 200% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 14% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 680MX performs better in 59 tests (98%)
- UHD Graphics P630 performs better in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.12 | 5.92 |
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 24 May 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 15 Watt |
GTX 680MX has a 54% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 713% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 680MX is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
