GMA 3150 vs GeForce GTX 680M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GMA 3150 GMA X3000 GMA X3100 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Contents

Share:
GTX 680M GTX 680M
GMA 3150 GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5761617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.51no data
Power efficiency6.10no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGK104Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2012 (14 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$310.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134416
Core clock speed719 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate84.900.8
Floating-point processing power2.038 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs1122
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680M 3287
+164250%
Samples: 482
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p67no data
Full HD64no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.85no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Palworld 18−20 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Palworld 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 128 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Palworld 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data
Palworld 18−20 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data
Palworld 10−12 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
Palworld 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data
Palworld 4−5 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 4 June 2012 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 680M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 61% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 669% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 680M GeForce GTX 680M
vs
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3430 Mobility Radeon HD 3430
GTX 680M GeForce GTX 680M
vs
GT 755M SLI GeForce GT 755M SLI
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
vs
ATI 2460 Multi-View FirePro 2460 Multi-View
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
vs
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
vs
RX 5600M Radeon RX 5600M
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
vs
UHD Graphics G7 UHD Graphics G7
R9 M290X Radeon R9 M290X
vs
ATI HD 4650 AGP Radeon HD 4650 AGP
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
K4100M Quadro K4100M
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
HD 8670 OEM Radeon HD 8670 OEM
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
vs
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
vs
RTX 4080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 69 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680M or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.