ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking394not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameN13E-GTXR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2012 (14 years ago)27 April 2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2688no data
Core clock speed720 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Texture fill rateno data3.400
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2012 27 April 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

GTX 680M SLI has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M SLI and All-In-Wonder X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M SLI is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680M SLI or All-In-Wonder X800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.