L20 vs GeForce GTX 675M

Place in the ranking	718	192
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.45	9.07
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GF114	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	22 March 2012 (14 years ago)	16 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	11776
Core clock speed	620 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	275 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.68	927.4
Floating-point processing power	0.9523 TFLOPS	59.35 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	128
TMUs	64	368
Tensor Cores	no data	368
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	92
L1 Cache	512 KB	11.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 KB	96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	256bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 675M 4.46

L20 32.23
+623%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675M 1858
Samples: 431

L20 13429
+623%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 675M 7110

L20 274276
+3758%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	48 −525%	300−350 +525%
Full HD	48 −525%	300−350 +525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −584%	130−140 +584%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Palworld	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	7−8 −614%	50−55 +614%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	18−20 −622%	130−140 +622%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −584%	130−140 +584%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −592%	90−95 +592%
Fortnite	24−27 −592%	180−190 +592%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −614%	150−160 +614%
Palworld	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −622%	130−140 +622%
Valorant	55−60 −602%	400−450 +602%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	18−20 −622%	130−140 +622%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −584%	130−140 +584%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	102 −586%	700−750 +586%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Dota 2	35−40 −618%	280−290 +618%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −592%	90−95 +592%
Fortnite	24−27 −592%	180−190 +592%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −614%	150−160 +614%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −614%	100−105 +614%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −588%	55−60 +588%
Palworld	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −622%	130−140 +622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −592%	90−95 +592%
Valorant	55−60 −602%	400−450 +602%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 −622%	130−140 +622%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Dota 2	35−40 −618%	280−290 +618%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −592%	90−95 +592%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −614%	150−160 +614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −622%	130−140 +622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −592%	90−95 +592%
Valorant	55−60 −602%	400−450 +602%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	24−27 −592%	180−190 +592%
Palworld	10−12 −582%	75−80 +582%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −588%	55−60 +588%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	30−35 −606%	240−250 +606%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −606%	240−250 +606%
Valorant	40−45 −582%	300−310 +582%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −588%	55−60 +588%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −600%	70−75 +600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Palworld	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −588%	110−120 +588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Valorant	18−20 −584%	130−140 +584%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Dota 2	14−16 −567%	100−105 +567%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

5−6
−600%

35−40

+600%

This is how GTX 675M and L20 compete in popular games:

L20 is 525% faster in 900p
L20 is 525% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.46	32.23
Recency	22 March 2012	16 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	275 Watt

GTX 675M has 175% lower power consumption.

L20, on the other hand, has a 623% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The L20 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M is a notebook graphics card while L20 is a workstation one.