Radeon RX Vega M vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with Radeon RX Vega M, including specs and performance data.
M outperforms 675M SLI by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 577 | 385 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.10 | 81.41 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | N12E-GTX2 | Vega |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 (15 years ago) | 1 February 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1190 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 38.08 |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | IGP |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 20−22 | 35−40
+75%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 80−85
+90.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 14−16 | 27−30
+80%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 20−22 | 35−40
+75%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 65−70
+85.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 80−85
+90.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 50−55
+92.3%
|
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 95−100
+93.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40 | 70−75
+94.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30 | 55−60
+89.7%
|
| Valorant | 80−85 | 150−160
+85.2%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 20−22 | 35−40
+75%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 65−70
+85.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 80−85
+90.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130 | 240−250
+89%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65 | 120−130
+96.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 50−55
+92.3%
|
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 95−100
+93.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40 | 70−75
+94.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30 | 55−60
+89.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30 | 55−60
+89.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24 | 40−45
+90.5%
|
| Valorant | 80−85 | 150−160
+85.2%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 65−70
+85.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65 | 120−130
+96.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 50−55
+92.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40 | 70−75
+94.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30 | 55−60
+89.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24 | 40−45
+90.5%
|
| Valorant | 80−85 | 150−160
+85.2%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 95−100
+93.9%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 27−30
+80%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60−65 | 120−130
+93.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−11 | 18−20
+80%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9 | 14−16
+75%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45 | 80−85
+86%
|
| Valorant | 80−85 | 150−160
+85.2%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 35−40
+94.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20 | 35−40
+84.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12 | 21−24
+90.9%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 6−7 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 3−4
+50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20 | 35−40
+94.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | 14−16
+75%
|
| Valorant | 35−40 | 65−70
+85.7%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | 16−18
+77.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 3−4
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 3−4
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−33 | 55−60
+83.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9 | 14−16
+75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | 24−27
+84.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9 | 14−16
+75%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9 | 14−16
+75%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.97 | 15.68 |
| Recency | 6 January 2011 | 1 February 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 15 Watt |
GTX 675M SLI has 87% lower power consumption.
RX Vega M, on the other hand, has a 97% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 65% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M SLI in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
