L40 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with L40, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
8.01

L40 outperforms 675M SLI by a whopping 573% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1013.91
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2011 (15 years ago)13 October 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76818176
Core clock speed620 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2490 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,414
Floating-point processing powerno data90.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142
L1 Cacheno data17.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Palworld 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
−557%
230−240
+557%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%
Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
Palworld 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
Valorant 80−85
−571%
550−600
+571%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
−557%
230−240
+557%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−569%
850−900
+569%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Dota 2 60−65
−556%
400−450
+556%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%
Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Palworld 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Valorant 80−85
−571%
550−600
+571%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−557%
230−240
+557%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Dota 2 60−65
−556%
400−450
+556%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Valorant 80−85
−571%
550−600
+571%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%
Palworld 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−545%
400−450
+545%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−559%
290−300
+559%
Valorant 80−85
−563%
550−600
+563%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Palworld 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Palworld 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Valorant 35−40
−557%
230−240
+557%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Dota 2 30−33
−567%
200−210
+567%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Palworld 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.01 53.93
Recency 6 January 2011 13 October 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has 14900% lower power consumption.

L40, on the other hand, has a 573% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The L40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook graphics card while L40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 32 votes

Rate L40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M SLI or L40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.