Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 690 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 130T Graphics 130V Graphics 140T Graphics 140V

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670 with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670
2012, $399
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.90
+4.5%

GTX 670 outperforms Graphics 140V by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 670 GTX 670
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking437452
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.15no data
Power efficiency5.87no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameGK104Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2012 (14 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13448
Core clock speed915 MHzno data
Boost clock speed980 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate109.8no data
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256-bit GDDR5no data
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 670 12.90
+4.5%
Arc Graphics 140V 12.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670 5375
+4.6%
Samples: 9755
Arc Graphics 140V 5139
Samples: 4582

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670 7000
Arc Graphics 140V 9819
+40.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+2.6%
39
−2.6%
1440p24−27
+0%
24
+0%
4K18−20
−5.6%
19
+5.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.98no data
1440p16.63no data
4K22.17no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 44
+0%
44
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 30
+0%
30
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+0%
61
+0%
Valorant 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 114
+0%
114
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX 670 and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670 is 3% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 6% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.90 12.34
Recency 10 May 2012 24 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

GTX 670 has a 5% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 670 and Arc Graphics 140V.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
GTX 950 GeForce GTX 950
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
vs
Pro W6800X Pro W6800X
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
vs
Pro W6800X Pro W6800X
Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
vs
Pro W6800X Pro W6800X
Tesla PG503-216 Tesla PG503-216
vs
Pro W6800X Pro W6800X
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
R7 Graphics R7 Graphics
HD 6850 Radeon HD 6850
vs
ATI HD 5870 Mac Edition HD 5870 Mac Edition
Tesla P100 SXM2 Tesla P100 SXM2
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Graphics 140V
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
RX 8800 XT RX 8800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 1289 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 104 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 670 or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.