GeForce 9100 vs GTX 660M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition with GeForce 9100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660M Mac Edition
2013
512 MB GDDR5, 50 Watt
1.47
+674%

660M Mac Edition outperforms 9100 by a whopping 674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10431473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.270.37
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK107C78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (13 years ago)6 May 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed950 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate30.404.000
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 0.19
Recency 1 April 2013 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 660M Mac Edition has a 674% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9100, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9100 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 20 votes

Rate GeForce 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition or GeForce 9100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.