FirePro M6100 vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 690 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3100 M3900 M4000 M4100 M4150 M4170 M5100 M5950 M6000 M6100 M8900

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM with FirePro M6100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.11

M6100 outperforms 660 OEM by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
FirePro M6100 FirePro M6100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking816651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.85no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGK104Emerald
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 August 2012 (13 years ago)27 May 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152896
Core clock speed823 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate85.2561.60
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS1.971 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs9656
L1 Cache96 KB224 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.170
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−117%
52
+117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 660 OEM and FirePro M6100 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro M6100 is 117% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.11 6.04
Recency 22 August 2012 27 May 2014

FirePro M6100 has a 94% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The FirePro M6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
GTX 280 GeForce GTX 280
FirePro M6100 FirePro M6100
vs
Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4150
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
vs
GTX 650 Ti 650 Ti
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
W4190M FirePro W4190M
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
R7 M440 R7 M440
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand R5 M230 Rebrand
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
FX 4000 FX 4000
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
6800 XT GeForce 6800 XT
GT 520 OEM GeForce GT 520 OEM
vs
Instinct MI60 Instinct MI60
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
vs
GeForce MX110 GeForce MX110
GT 620 GeForce GT 620
vs
RX 9060 XT 8 GB RX 9060 XT 8 GB
GT 630 GeForce GT 630
vs
Pro WX 4200 Pro WX 4200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 44 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 154 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 OEM or FirePro M6100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.