RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 630 OEM GT 640 GT 640 OEM GT 720 OEM GT 730 OEM GT 740 GT 1030 GK107 GTX 650
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A4 Mobile A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile 6 GB A2000 Max-Q A2000 Max-Q 8 GB A2000 Mobile A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 650
2012, $109
2 GB GDDR5, 64 Watt
4.21

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GTX 650 by a whopping 438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 650 GTX 650
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking735282
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.22no data
Power efficiency5.0118.44
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK107GA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 September 2012 (13 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed1058 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1687 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate33.86135.0
Floating-point processing power0.8125 TFLOPS8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs3280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache32 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length147 mmno data
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed5.0 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 650 4.21
RTX A2000 Mobile 22.64
+438%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 650 1755
Samples: 7622
RTX A2000 Mobile 9433
+437%
Samples: 2071

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 650 2270
RTX A2000 Mobile 13157
+480%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−464%
79
+464%
1440p7−8
−500%
42
+500%
4K7−8
−443%
38
+443%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.79no data
1440p15.57no data
4K15.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+0%
96
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50
+0%
50
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how GTX 650 and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 464% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 443% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.21 22.64
Recency 6 September 2012 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 95 Watt

GTX 650 has 48% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 438% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
UHD Graphics P750 UHD Graphics P750
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
ATI 3100 IGP Radeon 3100 IGP
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
8200M G mGPU GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
ATI Rage PRO Turbo PCI PRO Turbo PCI
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
RX 590 GME RX 590 GME
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
Tesla P6 Mobile Tesla P6 Mobile
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
GTX 760 X2 GeForce GTX 760 X2
vs
E9550 MXM Radeon E9550 MXM
GTX 760 X2 GeForce GTX 760 X2
vs
Riva TNT2 PRO TNT2 PRO
GTX 760 X2 GeForce GTX 760 X2
vs
Plex 2100 D4 Plex 2100 D4

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 4539 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 142 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 650 or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.