Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.01no data
Power efficiency4.74no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 March 2013 (13 years ago)15 November 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684480
Core clock speed980 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt281 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.05707.0
Floating-point processing power1.585 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24128
TMUs64280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cache64 KB2 MB
L2 Cache384 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm280 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s864.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.9
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2013 15 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 281 Watt

GTX 650 Ti Boost has 110% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 463 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.