FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with FirePro S9050, including specs and performance data.

GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013, $169
2 GB GDDR5, 134 Watt
8.20

S9050 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking566458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Power efficiency4.734.04
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 March 2013 (13 years ago)7 August 2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681792
Core clock speed980 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.05100.8
Floating-point processing power1.585 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs64112
L1 Cache64 KB448 KB
L2 Cache384 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm254 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s264 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.20
FirePro S9050 11.76
+43.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 3416
Samples: 2564
FirePro S9050 4901
+43.5%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.20 11.76
Recency 26 March 2013 7 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 650 Ti Boost has 68% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9050, on the other hand, has a 43% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro S9050 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 463 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost or FirePro S9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.