Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking567not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Power efficiency4.73no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK106Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 March 2013 (13 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688192
Core clock speed980 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt500 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.05230.4
Floating-point processing power1.585 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs24128
TMUs64256
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 500 Watt

GTX 650 Ti Boost has 273% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 463 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.