Radeon HD 6380G vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560M 560M SLI 570M 580M 580M SLI 675M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6310 6320 6330M 6350A 6350M 6370M 6380G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M SLI and Radeon HD 6380G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 580M SLI
2011
100 Watt
8.93
+1722%

580M SLI outperforms HD 6380G by a whopping 1722% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 580M SLI GTX 580M SLI
HD 6380G HD 6380G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5421323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.951.09
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2SuperSumo-M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (15 years ago)14 June 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768160
Core clock speed620 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p68
+2167%
3−4
Full HD93
+1760%
5−6
1200p81
+1925%
4−5

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data80.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+2300%
2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+220%
5−6
Resident Evil 4 Remake 16−18 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1900%
2−3
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+2300%
2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
Fortnite 50−55
+2600%
2−3
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+900%
4−5
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+220%
5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+300%
8−9
Valorant 85−90
+200%
27−30

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1900%
2−3
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+2300%
2−3
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+769%
16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
Dota 2 65−70
+509%
10−12
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
Fortnite 50−55
+2600%
2−3
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+900%
4−5
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+3200%
1−2
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+220%
5−6
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+300%
8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+283%
6−7
Valorant 85−90
+200%
27−30

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1900%
2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
Dota 2 65−70
+509%
10−12
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+900%
4−5
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+220%
5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+300%
8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+283%
6−7
Valorant 85−90
+200%
27−30

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+2600%
2−3

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+3350%
2−3
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+840%
5−6
Valorant 90−95
+2150%
4−5

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1100%
1−2

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 40−45
+700%
5−6

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+3200%
1−2
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3

This is how GTX 580M SLI and HD 6380G compete in popular games:

  • GTX 580M SLI is 2167% faster in 900p
  • GTX 580M SLI is 1760% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 580M SLI is 1925% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 580M SLI is 3350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 580M SLI surpassed HD 6380G in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.93 0.49
Recency 6 January 2011 14 June 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 580M SLI has a 1722% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 6380G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 65% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 580M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 580M SLI GeForce GTX 580M SLI
vs
GTX 670MX SLI GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
HD 6380G Radeon HD 6380G
vs
GT 230M GeForce GT 230M
GTX 580M SLI GeForce GTX 580M SLI
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
A2 PCIe PCIe
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
RX 7600 XT 7600 XT
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
RTX 4090 D 4090 D
GTX 580M SLI NVIDIA GTX 580M SLI
vs
R6 (Mullins) (Mullins)
GTX 580M SLI NVIDIA 580M SLI
vs
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
HD 6990M Crossfire AMD HD 6990M Crossfire
vs
P106M
GT 755M SLI NVIDIA GT 755M SLI
vs
GT 430 430
GT 755M SLI NVIDIA GT 755M SLI
vs
GTX 660M Mac Edition 660M Mac Edition
GT 755M SLI NVIDIA GT 755M SLI
vs
GTS 250 250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6380G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 580M SLI or Radeon HD 6380G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.