RTX A4500 Embedded vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M SLI with RTX A4500 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580M SLI
2011
100 Watt
9.13
RTX A4500 Embedded
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
21.36
+134%

RTX A4500 Embedded outperforms 580M SLI by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking530301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.0620.65
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2011 (15 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685888
Core clock speed620 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1215 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data223.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.31 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cacheno data5.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p68
−121%
150−160
+121%
Full HD93
−126%
210−220
+126%
1200p81
−122%
180−190
+122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−124%
110−120
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Palworld 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−124%
110−120
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Fortnite 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Palworld 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
Valorant 85−90
−125%
200−210
+125%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−124%
110−120
+124%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−114%
300−310
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Dota 2 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Fortnite 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Palworld 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Valorant 85−90
−125%
200−210
+125%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Dota 2 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Valorant 85−90
−125%
200−210
+125%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%
Palworld 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−129%
160−170
+129%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
Valorant 90−95
−123%
210−220
+123%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Palworld 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Palworld 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Valorant 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Palworld 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

This is how GTX 580M SLI and RTX A4500 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Embedded is 121% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4500 Embedded is 126% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Embedded is 122% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.13 21.36
Recency 6 January 2011 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

RTX A4500 Embedded has a 134% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580M SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 580M SLI or RTX A4500 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.