Arc B570 vs GeForce GTX 570
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 570 and Arc B570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
B570 outperforms GTX 570 by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 509 | 172 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.94 | 86.23 |
| Power efficiency | 3.35 | 17.48 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Xe2-HPG (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | BMG-G21 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 December 2010 (15 years ago) | 16 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $219 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Arc B570 has 4345% better value for money than GTX 570.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 19,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 360.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.405 TFLOPS | 11.52 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 80 |
| TMUs | 60 | 144 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 18 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 9 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | 272 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | 2375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | 380.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | + | - |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 80
−250%
| 280−290
+250%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 4.36
−458%
| 0.78
+458%
|
- Arc B570 has 458% lower cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−253%
|
180−190
+253%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−250%
|
70−75
+250%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−241%
|
75−80
+241%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
−233%
|
60−65
+233%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−257%
|
150−160
+257%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−253%
|
180−190
+253%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−250%
|
70−75
+250%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−255%
|
110−120
+255%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−251%
|
200−210
+251%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−257%
|
150−160
+257%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−241%
|
75−80
+241%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−253%
|
120−130
+253%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−226%
|
300−310
+226%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−257%
|
150−160
+257%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−253%
|
180−190
+253%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
−245%
|
500−550
+245%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−250%
|
70−75
+250%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−248%
|
240−250
+248%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−255%
|
110−120
+255%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−251%
|
200−210
+251%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−257%
|
150−160
+257%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
−243%
|
120−130
+243%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−242%
|
65−70
+242%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−241%
|
75−80
+241%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−253%
|
120−130
+253%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−240%
|
85−90
+240%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−226%
|
300−310
+226%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−257%
|
150−160
+257%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−250%
|
70−75
+250%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−248%
|
240−250
+248%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−255%
|
110−120
+255%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−257%
|
150−160
+257%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−253%
|
120−130
+253%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−240%
|
85−90
+240%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−226%
|
300−310
+226%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
−251%
|
200−210
+251%
|
| Palworld | 21−24
−241%
|
75−80
+241%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
−233%
|
60−65
+233%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−256%
|
260−270
+256%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−246%
|
45−50
+246%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
−250%
|
35−40
+250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
−240%
|
170−180
+240%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
−209%
|
300−310
+209%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−248%
|
80−85
+248%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−238%
|
27−30
+238%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−250%
|
70−75
+250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−248%
|
80−85
+248%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−246%
|
45−50
+246%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22
−250%
|
70−75
+250%
|
| Palworld | 12−14
−246%
|
45−50
+246%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−250%
|
70−75
+250%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−220%
|
16−18
+220%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−218%
|
35−40
+218%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−249%
|
150−160
+249%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−233%
|
40−45
+233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
−243%
|
120−130
+243%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−244%
|
55−60
+244%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
This is how GTX 570 and Arc B570 compete in popular games:
- Arc B570 is 250% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.48 | 33.90 |
| Recency | 7 December 2010 | 16 January 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 10 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 150 Watt |
Arc B570 has a 258% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 46% lower power consumption.
The Arc B570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
