Radeon 610M vs GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610M 620 625 630 660M 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 with Radeon 610M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 570 Rev. 2
2010, $349
1280 MB GDDR5, 219 Watt
6.58
+113%

570 Rev. 2 outperforms 610M by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 570 Rev. 2 GTX 570 Rev. 2
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking623820
Place by popularitynot in top-10081
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.93no data
Power efficiency2.3215.93
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF110Dragon Range
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2010 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480128
Core clock speed732 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate43.9217.60
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs608
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L0 Cacheno data32 KB
L1 Cache960 KB32 KB
L2 Cache640 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1280 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed950 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%
1440p50−55
+100%
25
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p16.62no data
1440p6.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
+0%
12
+0%
Metro Exodus 9
+0%
9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 61
+0%
61
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 570 Rev. 2 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 570 Rev. 2 is 91% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 570 Rev. 2 is 100% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.58 3.09
Recency 7 December 2010 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 570 Rev. 2 has a 113% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 1360% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 570 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
vs
GTX 560M GeForce GTX 560M
GTX 570 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 NVIDIA Quadro P3200
vs
Radeon 620 Radeon 620
GTX 950 Low Power NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
vs
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
vs
RX 570X RX 570X
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
vs
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 3070 Ti Mobile
RX 560X AMD Radeon RX 560X
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
550X Mobile AMD Radeon 550X Mobile
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
RX 5600 OEM AMD RX 5600 OEM
vs
RX 570X RX 570X
535 Mobile AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 11 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1243 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 or Radeon 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.