Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 with Quadro 2000D, including specs and performance data.
570 Rev. 2 outperforms 2000D by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 622 | 907 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.93 | 0.07 |
| Power efficiency | 2.32 | 2.93 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | GF106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 December 2010 (15 years ago) | 5 October 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $599 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
GTX 570 Rev. 2 has 1229% better value for money than Quadro 2000D.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.405 TFLOPS | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 16 |
| TMUs | 60 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 178 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.57 | 2.35 |
| Recency | 7 December 2010 | 5 October 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 1 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 62 Watt |
GTX 570 Rev. 2 has a 180% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Quadro 2000D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 253% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000D in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 2000D is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
