RTX PRO 6000 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 560M SLI with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.
560M SLI outperforms RTX PRO 6000 by a whopping 432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 649 | 1133 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.69 | 0.15 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | N12E-GS | GB202 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 (15 years ago) | 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 24064 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 2017 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2407 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 92,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1,810 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 115.8 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 176 |
| TMUs | no data | 752 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 752 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 188 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 23.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 128 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 96 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1.79 TB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+500%
|
5−6
−500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+500%
|
5−6
−500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+500%
|
4−5
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+517%
|
6−7
−517%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+475%
|
12−14
−475%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+500%
|
5−6
−500%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+461%
|
18−20
−461%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+456%
|
9−10
−456%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+500%
|
4−5
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+517%
|
6−7
−517%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+600%
|
3−4
−600%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+475%
|
12−14
−475%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+456%
|
9−10
−456%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+500%
|
4−5
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+475%
|
12−14
−475%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+517%
|
6−7
−517%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
+488%
|
8−9
−488%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+457%
|
7−8
−457%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+530%
|
10−11
−530%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+467%
|
3−4
−467%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.07 | 1.14 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 600 Watt |
GTX 560M SLI has a 432% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% lower power consumption.
RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 6000 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
