Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 983 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.28 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.56 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GF114 | GF106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 March 2011 (15 years ago) | 13 January 2011 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $46.56 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.67 | 17.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.263 TFLOPS | 0.4224 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1002 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 March 2011 | 13 January 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 55 Watt |
GTX 560 Ti OEM has an age advantage of 1 month.
Quadro 2000M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 209% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM and Quadro 2000M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
