Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.
PRO V710 outperforms 560 Ti 448 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 585 | 356 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.52 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.81 | 8.58 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 November 2011 (14 years ago) | 3 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 3456 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 158 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 40.99 | 432.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.312 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 40 | 96 |
| TMUs | 56 | 216 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 54 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 864 KB |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 54 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 28 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 224 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.9 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.62 | 17.52 |
| Recency | 29 November 2011 | 3 October 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 28 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 158 Watt |
PRO V710 has a 130% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 2140% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 33% lower power consumption.
The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
