ATI FireGL V7600 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking582not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.51no data
Power efficiency2.81no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF110R600
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 November 2011 (14 years ago)6 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448240
Core clock speed732 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt127 Watt
Texture fill rate40.997.200
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS0.288 TFLOPS
ROPs4012
TMUs5612
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB512 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 November 2011 6 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 127 Watt

GTX 560 Ti 448 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7600, on the other hand, has 65% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and FireGL V7600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 31 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or FireGL V7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.