RTX PRO 6000 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Place in the ranking	775	1131
Place by popularity	89	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.71	no data
Power efficiency	2.49	0.15
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code name	GF116	GB202
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 March 2011 (15 years ago)	2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	24064
Core clock speed	900 MHz	2017 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2407 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	116 Watt	600 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	100 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	28.80	1,810
Floating-point processing power	0.6912 TFLOPS	115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	176
TMUs	32	752
Tensor Cores	no data	752
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	188
L1 Cache	256 KB	23.5 MB
L2 Cache	384 KB	128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	210 mm	304 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	96 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	4.1 GB/s	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	98.4 GB/s	1.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI	4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
CUDA	+	10.1
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 550 Ti 3.74
+228%

RTX PRO 6000 1.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 550 Ti 1559
+230%

Samples: 8493

RTX PRO 6000 473
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	38 +280%	10−12 −280%
Full HD	37 +270%	10−12 −270%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.03

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Palworld	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Fortnite	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Palworld	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Valorant	50−55 +271%	14−16 −271%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	65−70 +278%	18−20 −278%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Dota 2	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Fortnite	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Palworld	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Valorant	50−55 +271%	14−16 −271%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Dota 2	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Valorant	50−55 +271%	14−16 −271%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Palworld	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3	0−1
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +244%	9−10 −244%
Valorant	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Palworld	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Valorant	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

This is how GTX 550 Ti and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:

GTX 550 Ti is 280% faster in 900p
GTX 550 Ti is 270% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.74	1.14
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	96 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	116 Watt	600 Watt

GTX 550 Ti has a 228% higher aggregate performance score, and 417% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Radeon HD 4890

RTX PRO 6000

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.9 60054 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.5 100 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 550 Ti or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.