GeForce GT 640M LE vs GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
465 470 470 PhysX Edition 470 X2 480 480 Core 512
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
615 GT 415M GT 420M GT 425M GT 435M GT 520M GT 525M GT 540M GT 550M GT 640M LE

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with GeForce GT 640M LE, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010, $279
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.35
+283%

GTX 465 outperforms 640M LE by a whopping 283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 465 GTX 465
GT 640M LE GT 640M LE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6361007
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.090.02
Power efficiency2.464.02
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF100GF108
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (16 years ago)4 May 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $849.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 465 has 5350% better value for money than GT 640M LE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352Up to 384
Core clock speed607 MHzUp to 500 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt20 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.7512.05
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS0.289 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs324
TMUs4416
L1 Cache704 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3\DDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)785 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/sUp to 28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536Up to 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 465 6.35
+283%
GT 640M LE 1.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 465 2645
+283%
Samples: 557
GT 640M LE 690
Samples: 377

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 465 9294
+295%
GT 640M LE 2350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p70−75
+268%
19
−268%
Full HD80−85
+281%
21
−281%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.49
+1061%
40.48
−1061%
  • GTX 465 has 1061% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and GT 640M LE compete in popular games:

  • GTX 465 is 268% faster in 900p
  • GTX 465 is 281% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.35 1.66
Recency 31 May 2010 4 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 465 has a 283% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 640M LE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M LE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 640M LE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
HD 6630M Radeon HD 6630M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
GTX 460 NVIDIA GTX 460
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
GTX 460 NVIDIA GTX 460
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GTX 460 NVIDIA GTX 460
vs
RX 7800 XT 7800 XT
GTX 460 NVIDIA 460
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB 3060 8 GB
GTX 460 NVIDIA GTX 460
vs
PRO W7800 48 GB W7800 48 GB
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
HD Graphics 5500 5500
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
HD Graphics 615 615
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GT 220 220
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GRID K220Q K220Q
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GRID K140Q K140Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 65 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or GeForce GT 640M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.