Rubin Ultra GPU vs GeForce GTX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking679not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.95no data
Power efficiency2.64no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameGF104GR110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 July 2010 (16 years ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33657344
Core clock speed675 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2267 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate37.804,062.5
Floating-point processing power0.9072 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs561792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cache448 KB112 MB
L2 Cache512 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.1N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 3600 Watt

GTX 460 has 96% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 93% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 is a desktop graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1136 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.