Quadro P3200 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 645 OEM GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 555 OEM GTX 560 GTX 560 SE GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 v2 with Quadro P3200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 v2
2011, $199
1 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
4.92

P3200 outperforms 460 v2 by a whopping 315% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking696315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Power efficiency2.3821.09
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF114GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date24 September 2011 (15 years ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3361792
Core clock speed779 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1543 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate43.62172.8
Floating-point processing power1.046 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs56112
L1 Cache448 KB672 KB
L2 Cache384 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.19 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.16.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 v2 4.92
Quadro P3200 20.43
+315%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460 v2 2048
Samples: 231
Quadro P3200 8513
+316%
Samples: 609

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 460 v2 8743
Quadro P3200 33960
+288%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−367%
84
+367%
4K6−7
−367%
28
+367%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.06no data
4K33.17no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+0%
88
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+0%
72
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how GTX 460 v2 and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 367% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 367% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.92 20.43
Recency 24 September 2011 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P3200 has a 315% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 113% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 v2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
ATI HD 5850 Radeon HD 5850
510 OEM GeForce 510 OEM
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
K5100M Quadro K5100M
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
GeForce2 Ti GeForce2 Ti
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
Volari V3
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
GT 335M GeForce GT 335M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 21 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 358 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 v2 or Quadro P3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.