FirePro S9170 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking690not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.93no data
Power efficiency2.39no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGF114Hawaii
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 September 2011 (14 years ago)8 July 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3362816
Core clock speed779 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate43.62163.7
Floating-point processing power1.046 TFLOPS5.238 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs56176
L1 Cache448 KB704 KB
L2 Cache384 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.19 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2011 8 July 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 275 Watt

GTX 460 v2 has 72% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and FirePro S9170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 v2 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9170 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 v2 or FirePro S9170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.