Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking843not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.47no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010)
GPU code nameGF104GMA HD
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33612
Core clock speed650 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate36.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed850 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 460 OEM has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, on the other hand, has 329% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 OEM and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 20 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 OEM or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.