GeForce 7200 GS vs GTX 460 768MB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce 7200 GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 768MB
4.00
+6567%

460 768MB outperforms 7200 GS by a whopping 6567% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7521557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameno dataG72
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data18 January 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336no data
Core clock speed675 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data112 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data90 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.800
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz334 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.344 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD470−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Palworld 10−11 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Palworld 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
Valorant 50−55 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+7100%
1−2
−7100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
Palworld 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 50−55 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 50−55 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Palworld 10−11 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Palworld 5−6 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Valorant 18−20 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 0.06

GTX 460 768MB has a 6567% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7200 GS in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 87 votes

Rate GeForce 7200 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 768MB or GeForce 7200 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.