FirePro W2100 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB with FirePro W2100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 768MB
4.00
+84.3%

460 768MB outperforms W2100 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking752928
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.46
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameno dataOland
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data12 August 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336320
Core clock speed675 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speedno data680 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data26 Watt
Texture fill rateno data13.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data20
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datalow profile / half length
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data2
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 768MB 4.00
+84.3%
FirePro W2100 2.17

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 460 768MB 2092
+92.8%
FirePro W2100 1085

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 460 768MB 17589
+126%
FirePro W2100 7771

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+292%
12
−292%
4K3−4
+50%
2
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Palworld 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Fortnite 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Palworld 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Valorant 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+63.6%
40−45
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Fortnite 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Palworld 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Valorant 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Valorant 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Palworld 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Valorant 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Palworld 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and FirePro W2100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is 292% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 460 768MB is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 460 768MB is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 460 768MB surpassed FirePro W2100 in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 2.17

GTX 460 768MB has a 84% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop graphics card while FirePro W2100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 102 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 768MB or FirePro W2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.