GeForce2 Go 100 vs GeForce GTX 285M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1055not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.44no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2010 (16 years ago)6 February 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors754 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate38.400.5
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops576no data
ROPs162
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
SLI options2-way-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1020 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2010 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 2 Watt

GTX 285M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 177% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 100, on the other hand, has 3650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285M and GeForce2 Go 100. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M or GeForce2 Go 100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.