ATI All-In-Wonder X800 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking770not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.97no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed576 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million160 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data8.000
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 21 September 2004
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm

GTX 285M SLI has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 136% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and All-In-Wonder X800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or All-In-Wonder X800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.