GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs GTX 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5050 Mobile 5060 3584SP Mobile 5060 Mobile 5070 Mobile 5070 Ti Mobile 5080 Mobile 5090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285 with GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285
2008, $359
1 GB GDDR3, 204 Watt
3.49

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms GTX 285 by a whopping 864% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285 GTX 285
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking790176
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency1.3252.08
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGT200BGB207
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 December 2008 (17 years ago)24 June 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402560
Core clock speed648 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million16,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate51.84120.0
Floating-point processing power0.7085 TFLOPS7.68 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1242 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth159.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 285 3.49
RTX 5050 Mobile 33.66
+864%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 285 1454
Samples: 830
RTX 5050 Mobile 14025
+865%
Samples: 2170

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−971%
75
+971%
1440p4−5
−925%
41
+925%

Cost per frame, $

1080p51.29no data
1440p89.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Palworld 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Palworld 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how GTX 285 and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 971% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 925% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.49 33.66
Recency 23 December 2008 24 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 5050 Mobile has a 864% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1000% more advanced lithography process, and 308% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
RTX 5050 Mobile GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
Radeon 550X Radeon 550X
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
HD 8400 HD 8400
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Hybrid X2 Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
GT 640 OEM Rebrand GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
Sky 500 Sky 500
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
vs
GTX 285 285
9600 GT Mac Edition GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
vs
FX 1700 Mac Edition FX 1700 Mac Edition
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
GeForce 8400 GeForce 8400
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
8800 GTS 112 GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
FX 5200 FX 5200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 117 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 465 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285 or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.