GeForce GT 650M SLI vs GTX 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
620M 625M 630M 635M 640M 640M LE 640M Mac Edition 645M 650M 650M Mac Edition 650M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285 with GeForce GT 650M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285
2008, $359
1 GB GDDR3, 204 Watt
3.48

650M SLI outperforms GTX 285 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285 GTX 285
GT 650M SLI GT 650M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking793708
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency1.32no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGT200BN13E-GE
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 December 2008 (17 years ago)22 March 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240768
Core clock speed648 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speedno data835 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate51.84no data
Floating-point processing power0.7085 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2x2 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed1242 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth159.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p55−60
−43.6%
79
+43.6%
Full HD35−40
−42.9%
50
+42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 139
+0%
139
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 285 and GT 650M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GT 650M SLI is 44% faster in 900p
  • GT 650M SLI is 43% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.48 4.66
Recency 23 December 2008 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

GT 650M SLI has a 34% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 650M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
GT 740 GeForce GT 740
GT 650M SLI GeForce GT 650M SLI
vs
HD 6990M Radeon HD 6990M
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
6800 GT GeForce 6800 GT
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
GTX 295 GTX 295
vs
GTX 675MX GTX 675MX
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
K2000D Quadro K2000D
GTX 285 GeForce GTX 285
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
Atari VCS 400 GPU Atari VCS 400 GPU
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile
GTX 260 216 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
vs
RX 6950 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 117 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285 or GeForce GT 650M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.