GeForce 8400 vs GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 280M SLI with GeForce 8400, including specs and performance data.

GTX 280M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.21
+1589%

280M SLI outperforms 8400 by a whopping 1589% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8071476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.660.59
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXG98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)4 December 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$69.78

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2568
Core clock speed585 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.320
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Palworld 8−9 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Fortnite 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
Palworld 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+1900%
3−4
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Fortnite 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10 0−1
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
Palworld 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Palworld 8−9 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Valorant 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 0−1
Palworld 4−5 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.21 0.19
Recency 2 March 2009 4 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 280M SLI has a 1589% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 8400, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M SLI or GeForce 8400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.