ATI FirePro V3700 vs GeForce GTX 275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking805not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Power efficiency1.14no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGT200BRV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 January 2009 (17 years ago)8 August 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24040
Core clock speed633 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt32 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.643.200
Floating-point processing power0.6739 TFLOPS0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs284
TMUs804
L2 Cache224 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB256 MB
Memory bus width448 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz950 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s15.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI2x DVI
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.03.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2009 8 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 256 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 32 Watt

GTX 275 has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI V3700, on the other hand, has 584% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 275 and FirePro V3700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V3700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 143 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate FirePro V3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 or FirePro V3700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.