GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs GTX 260M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.10no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV36S
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2009 (17 years ago)18 August 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed550 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors754 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate30.801.700
Floating-point processing power0.308 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops462no data
ROPs164
TMUs564
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex
SLI options2-way-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 950 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 18 August 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 260M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260M and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260M or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.