Tesla T4 vs GeForce GTX 260 216
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 267 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.90 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GT200 | TU104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 September 2008 (17 years ago) | 13 September 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 216 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1590 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 182 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.47 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.5365 TFLOPS | 8.141 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 28 | 64 |
| TMUs | 72 | 160 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 320 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 40 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 September 2008 | 13 September 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 182 Watt | 70 Watt |
Tesla T4 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1729% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 442% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and Tesla T4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
