Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1650 Ti Mobile 1660 Max-Q 1660 Mobile 1660 Ti Mobile 1660 Ti Max-Q 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI6 Pro Duo Polaris Pro V7300X Pro V7350X2 Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 7100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with Radeon Pro WX 7100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019, $229
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
25.70
+39.1%

1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Pro 7100 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 7100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking255340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.503.23
Power efficiency24.9011.02
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Ellesmere
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (7 years ago)10 November 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 689% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362304
Core clock speed1455 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate152.6179.0
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS5.728 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs96144
L1 Cache1.5 MB576 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+46.7%
60−65
1440p58
+45%
40−45
4K35
+45.8%
24−27

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60
+80.5%
13.32
1440p3.95
+80.2%
19.98
4K6.54
+80.3%
33.29
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 80% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 80% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 80% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 109
+118%
50−55
Counter-Strike 2 147
+38.7%
100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+115%
40−45
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75
+78.6%
40−45

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 81
+62%
50−55
Battlefield 5 111
+42.3%
75−80
Counter-Strike 2 133
+25.5%
100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+70%
40−45
Far Cry 5 93
+50%
60−65
Fortnite 120−130
+26%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 134
+74%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+46.5%
70−75
Valorant 209
+49.3%
140−150

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 50 50−55
Battlefield 5 103
+32.1%
75−80
Counter-Strike 2 101 100−110
+5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+16.2%
220−230
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+35%
40−45
Dota 2 121
+12%
100−110
Far Cry 5 89
+43.5%
60−65
Fortnite 120−130
+26%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 125
+62.3%
75−80
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+50%
70−75
Metro Exodus 54
+35%
40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+46.5%
70−75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+98.1%
50−55
Valorant 207
+47.9%
140−150

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 94
+20.5%
75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+30%
40−45
Dota 2 116
+7.4%
100−110
Far Cry 5 83
+33.9%
60−65
Forza Horizon 4 99
+28.6%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+53.5%
70−75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+5.8%
50−55
Valorant 125 140−150
+12%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 107
+7%
100−105

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+52.6%
35−40
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+36%
130−140
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+53.1%
30−35
Metro Exodus 30
+25%
24−27
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4.8%
160−170
Valorant 197
+20.9%
160−170

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 69
+30.2%
50−55
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+38.9%
18−20
Far Cry 5 60
+42.9%
40−45
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+44.7%
45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+53.6%
27−30

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 69
+60.5%
40−45

4K
High

Atomic Heart 21−24
+40%
14−16
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+47.1%
30−35
Metro Exodus 19
+26.7%
14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+29.6%
27−30
Valorant 152
+55.1%
95−100

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38
+35.7%
27−30
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+42.9%
7−8
Dota 2 85
+30.8%
65−70
Far Cry 5 31
+47.6%
21−24
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+39.4%
30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+52.6%
18−20

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+52.6%
18−20

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Pro WX 7100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 47% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 45% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 46% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 118% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 12% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile performs better in 59 tests (95%)
  • Pro WX 7100 performs better in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 25.70 18.48
Recency 23 April 2019 10 November 2016
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 130 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 39% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 38% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 7100, on the other hand, has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 8040S Radeon 8040S
RX 550X Mobile 550X Mobile
vs
RX 6950 XT 6950 XT
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
GT 650M 650M
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
HD 7670M 7670M
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
HD 7530M 7530M
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
ATI Mobility 9100 IGP 9100 IGP
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
GeForce 210 210
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
FX 5600 Ultra 5600 Ultra
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 M64 Vanta-16
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
FX Go5200 Go5200
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
Xbox One X GPU X GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 1822 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 63 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or Radeon Pro WX 7100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.