CMP 40HX vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with CMP 40HX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019, $229
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
25.71
+13.3%

1660 Ti Mobile outperforms CMP 40HX by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking252279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.4510.53
Power efficiency24.869.49
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU116TU106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (7 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 151% better value for money than CMP 40HX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362304
Core clock speed1455 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate152.6237.6
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs96144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache1.5 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
1440p58
+16%
50−55
−16%
4K35
+16.7%
30−35
−16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60
+258%
9.32
−258%
1440p3.95
+254%
13.98
−254%
4K6.54
+256%
23.30
−256%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 258% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 254% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 256% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 147
+22.5%
120−130
−22.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+14.7%
75−80
−14.7%
Palworld 81
+15.7%
70−75
−15.7%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75
+15.4%
65−70
−15.4%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 111
+16.8%
95−100
−16.8%
Counter-Strike 2 133
+20.9%
110−120
−20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 93
+16.3%
80−85
−16.3%
Fortnite 120−130
+14.5%
110−120
−14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+21.8%
110−120
−21.8%
Palworld 70
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+15.6%
90−95
−15.6%
Valorant 209
+16.1%
180−190
−16.1%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 103
+14.4%
90−95
−14.4%
Counter-Strike 2 101
+18.8%
85−90
−18.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+15.2%
230−240
−15.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+20%
45−50
−20%
Dota 2 121
+21%
100−105
−21%
Far Cry 5 89
+18.7%
75−80
−18.7%
Fortnite 120−130
+14.5%
110−120
−14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+13.6%
110−120
−13.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+16.7%
90−95
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 54
+20%
45−50
−20%
Palworld 55
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+15.6%
90−95
−15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+14.4%
90−95
−14.4%
Valorant 207
+15%
180−190
−15%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 94
+17.5%
80−85
−17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Dota 2 116
+16%
100−105
−16%
Far Cry 5 83
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+16.5%
85−90
−16.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+14.7%
95−100
−14.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Valorant 125
+13.6%
110−120
−13.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 107
+18.9%
90−95
−18.9%
Palworld 51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+15.6%
160−170
−15.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Metro Exodus 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
−16.7%
Valorant 197
+15.9%
170−180
−15.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 69
+15%
60−65
−15%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 60
+20%
50−55
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 69
+15%
60−65
−15%
Palworld 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Metro Exodus 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Palworld 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Valorant 152
+16.9%
130−140
−16.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Dota 2 85
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 31
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+15%
40−45
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Palworld 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and CMP 40HX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 17% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 16% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.71 22.70
Recency 23 April 2019 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 185 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, and 131% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 40HX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1821 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 75 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or CMP 40HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.