Tesla P40 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated234
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.03
Power efficiencyno data8.62
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU117BGP102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 April 2020 (6 years ago)13 September 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243840
Core clock speed1380 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed1515 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate96.96367.4
Floating-point processing power3.103 TFLOPS11.76 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64240
L1 Cache1 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1808 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s347.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.56.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Tesla P40, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh and Tesla P40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh is a notebook graphics card while Tesla P40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 263 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 215 votes

Rate Tesla P40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh or Tesla P40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.