GeForce 9400 vs GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.70
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU117BC79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 April 2020 (6 years ago)18 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
Core clock speed1380 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1515 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate96.963.600
Floating-point processing power3.103 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs648
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9400, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh and GeForce 9400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 262 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh or GeForce 9400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.