Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) vs GeForce GTX 1630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1630 1650 1650 GDDR6 1650 SUPER 1650 TU106 1650 TU116 1660 1660 Super 1660 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1630 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

GTX 1630
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
11.95
+28.5%

GTX 1630 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1630 GTX 1630
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking458523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.33no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameTU117Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2022 (4 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51264
Core clock speed1740 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate57.12no data
Floating-point processing power1.828 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache512 KB768 KB
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+20%
20
−20%
1440p7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 1630 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1630 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1630 is 17% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.95 9.30
Recency 28 June 2022 6 January 2025

GTX 1630 has a 28% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
vs
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
vs
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
vs
R9 270X Radeon R9 270X
RX 6500 Radeon RX 6500
vs
Graphics 512SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
vs
HD 7410M HD 7410M
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
Arc A380 Arc A380
vs
RX 7900M RX 7900M
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
vs
Jetson TX1 Jetson TX1
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
HD 8310G HD 8310G
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Go 7900 GTX SLI Go 7900 GTX SLI
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R5 230 OEM R5 230 OEM
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
310 OEM GeForce 310 OEM
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
ATI V9800 FirePro V9800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 1523 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 98 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1630 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.