Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GeForce GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO V710 PRO W7400 PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900 PRO W7900 Dual Slot PRO W7900D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017, $699
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
44.45
PRO W7700
2023, $999
16 GB GDDR6, 190 Watt
54.56
+22.7%

PRO W7700 outperforms 1080 Ti by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti
PRO W7700 PRO W7700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9754
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.3031.52
Power efficiency13.8522.38
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 March 2017 (9 years ago)13 November 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

PRO W7700 has 63% better value for money than GTX 1080 Ti.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843072
Core clock speed1481 MHz1617 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz2153 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt190 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.4413.4
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8896
TMUs224192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L0 Cacheno data768 KB
L1 Cache1.3 MB768 KB
L2 Cache2.75 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount11 GB16 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Ti 44.45
PRO W7700 54.56
+22.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18597
Samples: 33422
PRO W7700 22825
+22.7%
Samples: 87

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD129150−160
+16.3%
1440p84
−16%
100−110
4K6780−85
+19.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.42
+18.6%
6.66
1440p8.32
+16.7%
9.99
4K10.43
+16.5%
12.49
  • GTX 1080 Ti has 19% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti has 17% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti has 16% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250 290−300
+19.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 130−140
+21.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110 130−140
+19.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130 150−160
+19%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 166 200−210
+20.5%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 290−300
+19.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 130−140
+21.5%
Far Cry 5 120 140−150
+16.7%
Fortnite 190−200 230−240
+19.8%
Forza Horizon 4 147 180−190
+22.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110 130−140
+19.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 125 150−160
+20%
Valorant 260−270 300−310
+14.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 154 180−190
+16.9%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 290−300
+19.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 130−140
+21.5%
Dota 2 133 160−170
+20.3%
Far Cry 5 117 140−150
+19.7%
Fortnite 203 240−250
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 145 170−180
+17.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 120 140−150
+16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110 130−140
+19.3%
Metro Exodus 90 110−120
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115 140−150
+21.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180 200−210
+17%
Valorant 260−270 300−310
+14.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 149 180−190
+20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 130−140
+21.5%
Dota 2 125 150−160
+20%
Far Cry 5 109 130−140
+19.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120 140−150
+16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110 130−140
+19.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102 120−130
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 120−130
+22.4%
Valorant 179 210−220
+17.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 163 200−210
+22.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 140−150
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 350−400
+9.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 84 100−105
+19%
Metro Exodus 56 65−70
+16.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+20%
Valorant 290−300 350−400
+17.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 118 140−150
+18.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 65−70
+18.2%
Far Cry 5 97 110−120
+13.4%
Forza Horizon 4 102 120−130
+17.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60 65−70
+18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95 110−120
+19.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 107 130−140
+21.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60 65−70
+18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 98 120−130
+22.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 35−40
+20.7%
Metro Exodus 35 40−45
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 85−90
+18.1%
Valorant 270−280 300−310
+9.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70 85−90
+21.4%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 65−70
+18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 30−33
+15.4%
Dota 2 125 150−160
+20%
Far Cry 5 55 65−70
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 75 90−95
+20%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 35−40
+20.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45 55−60
+22.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 51 60−65
+17.6%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 16% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7700 is 19% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7700 is 19% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.45 54.56
Recency 10 March 2017 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 190 Watt

PRO W7700 has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 45% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 69% more advanced lithography process, and 24% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
GTX 1080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
UHD Graphics 600 Graphics 600
GTX 1080 Ti NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 1050 Ti Max-Q
GTX 1080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
RX 580X RX 580X
GTX 1080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
T1000 Mobile GDDR6 Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
GTX 1080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
ROG Ally GPU Ally GPU
GTX 1080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Threads MTT S30
RX 570 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
RX 6800 AMD RX 6800
vs
RX 480 Mobile RX 480 Mobile
RX 480 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
vs
T400 Mobile Quadro T400 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 13344 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.