Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5X, 110 Watt
24.35

PRO W7700 outperforms 1080 Max-Q by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26754
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.91
Power efficiency17.2622.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGP104BNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (9 years ago)13 November 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603072
Core clock speed1227 MHz1617 MHz
Boost clock speed1366 MHz2153 MHz
Number of transistors7.2 billion28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate218.6413.4
ROPs6496
TMUs160192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L0 Cacheno data768 KB
L1 Cache960 KB768 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 24.35
PRO W7700 54.45
+124%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 10207
Samples: 218
PRO W7700 22825
+124%
Samples: 87

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102220−230
+116%
1440p66
−52.9%
140−150
4K50
−54.5%
110−120

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.54
1440pno data7.14
4Kno data9.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 140−150 300−310
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 120−130
+118%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 110−120
+112%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 55−60 130−140
+120%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 133 290−300
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150 300−310
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 120−130
+118%
Far Cry 5 91 200−210
+120%
Fortnite 188 400−450
+113%
Forza Horizon 4 124 270−280
+118%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 110−120
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 111 240−250
+116%
Valorant 160−170 350−400
+107%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 121 270−280
+123%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150 300−310
+114%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270 550−600
+112%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 120−130
+118%
Dota 2 106 230−240
+117%
Far Cry 5 89 190−200
+113%
Fortnite 127 280−290
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 122 270−280
+121%
Grand Theft Auto V 94 210−220
+123%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 110−120
+112%
Metro Exodus 64 140−150
+119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 104 230−240
+121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118 260−270
+120%
Valorant 203 450−500
+122%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 108 240−250
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 120−130
+118%
Dota 2 102 220−230
+116%
Far Cry 5 85 190−200
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 106 230−240
+117%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55 110−120
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80 170−180
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64 140−150
+119%
Valorant 128 280−290
+119%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 109 240−250
+120%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 120−130
+122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 350−400
+97.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 61 130−140
+113%
Metro Exodus 37 80−85
+116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 350−400
+100%
Valorant 194 400−450
+106%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 82 180−190
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 55−60
+120%
Far Cry 5 66 140−150
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 84 180−190
+114%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 60−65
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 85−90
+113%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 64 140−150
+119%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 55−60
+120%
Grand Theft Auto V 64 140−150
+119%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 35−40
+119%
Metro Exodus 23 50−55
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45 100−105
+122%
Valorant 185 400−450
+116%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45 100−105
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 55−60
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 24−27
+118%
Dota 2 80−85 180−190
+122%
Far Cry 5 34 75−80
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 55 120−130
+118%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 35−40
+119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27 60−65
+122%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 34 75−80
+121%

This is how GTX 1080 Max-Q and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 116% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7700 is 112% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7700 is 120% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.35 54.45
Recency 27 June 2017 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 190 Watt

GTX 1080 Max-Q has 42% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 124% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 69% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 46 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.