RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded vs GeForce GTX 1070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1060 3 GB GP104 1060 6 GB GDDR5X 1060 6 GB GP104 1070 1070 GDDR5X 1070 Ti 1080 1080 11Gbps
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070
2016, $379
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
32.43
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded
8 GB GDDR7, 45 Watt
38.99
+20.2%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded outperforms GTX 1070 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1070 GTX 1070
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192133
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.95no data
Power efficiency16.7667.17
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGP104GB206
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 June 2016 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19203328
Core clock speed1506 MHz2160 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2662 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate202.0276.8
Floating-point processing power6.463 TFLOPS17.72 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs120104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache720 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 32.43
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded 38.99
+20.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 13510
Samples: 54274
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded 16242
+20.2%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD117140−150
+19.7%
1440p6980−85
+15.9%
4K4955−60
+12.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.24no data
1440p5.49no data
4K7.73no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 95−100 110−120
+14.6%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 220−230
+19.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 90−95
+20%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 80−85 100−105
+19%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 95−100 110−120
+14.6%
Battlefield 5 141 160−170
+13.5%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 220−230
+19.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 90−95
+20%
Far Cry 5 106 120−130
+13.2%
Fortnite 256 300−310
+17.2%
Forza Horizon 4 129 150−160
+16.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 135 160−170
+18.5%
Valorant 200−210 240−250
+17.1%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 95−100 110−120
+14.6%
Battlefield 5 119 140−150
+17.6%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 220−230
+19.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 90−95
+20%
Dota 2 130−140 160−170
+15.9%
Far Cry 5 100 120−130
+20%
Fortnite 175 210−220
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 121 140−150
+15.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 111 130−140
+17.1%
Metro Exodus 62 70−75
+12.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 122 140−150
+14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120 140−150
+16.7%
Valorant 200−210 240−250
+17.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 107 120−130
+12.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 90−95
+20%
Dota 2 130−140 160−170
+15.9%
Far Cry 5 90 100−105
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 94 110−120
+17%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 81 95−100
+17.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63 75−80
+19%
Valorant 200−210 240−250
+17.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 127 150−160
+18.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 90−95
+15.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 270−280
+17.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 75−80
+13.6%
Metro Exodus 38 45−50
+18.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+20%
Valorant 230−240 280−290
+18.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 84 100−105
+19%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 40−45
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 68 80−85
+17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 79 90−95
+13.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 70−75
+18.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 79 90−95
+13.9%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27 30−33
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 62 70−75
+12.9%
Metro Exodus 23 27−30
+17.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 50−55
+16.3%
Valorant 190−200 230−240
+16.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45 50−55
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 18−20
+12.5%
Dota 2 95−100 110−120
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 35 40−45
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 52 60−65
+15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35 40−45
+14.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 39 45−50
+15.4%

This is how GTX 1070 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is 20% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is 16% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is 12% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.43 38.99
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 45 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, a 69% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
vs
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
vs
RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5600 XT
GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
vs
HD 7870 XT HD 7870 XT
GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
vs
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 1070
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D
vs
GTX 1070 1070
GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
vs
Playstation 5 Pro GPU 5 Pro GPU
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
vs
E9173 PCIe Radeon E9173 PCIe
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
GTX 980 Ti 980 Ti
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 10843 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.