Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and Radeon RX 6600 LE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
1070 SLI outperforms 6600 LE by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 149 | 179 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 9.47 | 19.52 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 SLI | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 August 2016 (10 years ago) | 8 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1626 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 2495 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 14400 Million | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 132 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 279.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 8.942 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 112 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 28 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 448 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 190 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 118
+18%
| 100−110 |
| 4K | 56
+12%
| 50−55 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 110−120
+11%
|
100−105 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+13.9%
|
180−190 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+14.7%
|
75−80 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 110−120
+11%
|
100−105 |
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+17.3%
|
110−120 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+13.9%
|
180−190 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+14.7%
|
75−80 |
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+19%
|
100−105 |
| Fortnite | 280
+12%
|
250−260 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+19.2%
|
120−130 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+13.1%
|
130−140 |
| Valorant | 220−230
+12%
|
200−210 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 110−120
+11%
|
100−105 |
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+17.3%
|
110−120 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+13.9%
|
180−190 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+11.2%
|
250−260 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+14.7%
|
75−80 |
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+19.2%
|
120−130 |
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+19%
|
100−105 |
| Far Cry 6 | 100−110
+13.7%
|
95−100 |
| Fortnite | 176
+17.3%
|
150−160 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+19.2%
|
120−130 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 87
+16%
|
75−80 |
| Metro Exodus | 85−90
+17.3%
|
75−80 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+13.1%
|
130−140 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 111
+11%
|
100−105 |
| Valorant | 220−230
+12%
|
200−210 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+17.3%
|
110−120 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+14.7%
|
75−80 |
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+19.2%
|
120−130 |
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+19%
|
100−105 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+19.2%
|
120−130 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+13.1%
|
130−140 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 73
+12.3%
|
65−70 |
| Valorant | 220−230
+12%
|
200−210 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 123
+11.8%
|
110−120 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+15%
|
80−85 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
+12.6%
|
230−240 |
| Far Cry 6 | 65−70
+13.3%
|
60−65 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 75−80
+16.9%
|
65−70 |
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+20%
|
45−50 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+16.7%
|
150−160 |
| Valorant | 250−260
+11.7%
|
230−240 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+12.9%
|
85−90 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+20%
|
35−40 |
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+12.5%
|
80−85 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+15.6%
|
90−95 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 70−75
+16.7%
|
60−65 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+14.1%
|
85−90 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 30−33
+11.1%
|
27−30 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+22.9%
|
35−40 |
| Far Cry 6 | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 81
+15.7%
|
70−75 |
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+22.2%
|
27−30 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 54
+20%
|
45−50 |
| Valorant | 220−230
+13%
|
200−210 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+18%
|
50−55 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+22.9%
|
35−40 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18 |
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+13.7%
|
95−100 |
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+20%
|
40−45 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+15%
|
60−65 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+22.5%
|
40−45 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 38
+26.7%
|
30−33 |
This is how GTX 1070 SLI and RX 6600 LE compete in popular games:
- GTX 1070 SLI is 18% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1070 SLI is 12% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 36.49 | 33.08 |
| Recency | 16 August 2016 | 8 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 132 Watt |
GTX 1070 SLI has a 10% higher aggregate performance score.
RX 6600 LE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 56% more advanced lithography process, and 56% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 LE in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
