RTX PRO 6000 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.
1070 SLI outperforms RTX PRO 6000 by a whopping 3117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 148 | 1133 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 9.46 | 0.15 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 SLI | GB202 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 August 2016 (10 years ago) | 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 24064 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 2017 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 14400 Million | 92,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1,810 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 115.8 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 176 |
| TMUs | no data | 752 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 752 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 188 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 23.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 128 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1.79 TB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.4 |
| CUDA | + | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 118
+3833%
| 3−4
−3833%
|
| 4K | 56
+5500%
| 1−2
−5500%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 110−120
+3600%
|
3−4
−3600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+3317%
|
6−7
−3317%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 110−120
+3600%
|
3−4
−3600%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+3125%
|
4−5
−3125%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+3317%
|
6−7
−3317%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+3867%
|
3−4
−3867%
|
| Fortnite | 280
+3400%
|
8−9
−3400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+3475%
|
4−5
−3475%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+3800%
|
3−4
−3800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+3575%
|
4−5
−3575%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+3633%
|
6−7
−3633%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 110−120
+3600%
|
3−4
−3600%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+3125%
|
4−5
−3125%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+3317%
|
6−7
−3317%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+3375%
|
8−9
−3375%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+3475%
|
4−5
−3475%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+3867%
|
3−4
−3867%
|
| Fortnite | 176
+3420%
|
5−6
−3420%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+3475%
|
4−5
−3475%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+3800%
|
3−4
−3800%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 87
+4250%
|
2−3
−4250%
|
| Metro Exodus | 85−90
+4300%
|
2−3
−4300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+3575%
|
4−5
−3575%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 111
+3600%
|
3−4
−3600%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+3633%
|
6−7
−3633%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+3125%
|
4−5
−3125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+3475%
|
4−5
−3475%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+3867%
|
3−4
−3867%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+3475%
|
4−5
−3475%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+3575%
|
4−5
−3575%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 73
+3550%
|
2−3
−3550%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+3633%
|
6−7
−3633%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 123
+4000%
|
3−4
−4000%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+4500%
|
2−3
−4500%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 260−270
+3150%
|
8−9
−3150%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 75−80
+3700%
|
2−3
−3700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+3400%
|
5−6
−3400%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+3571%
|
7−8
−3571%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+4700%
|
2−3
−4700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+4400%
|
2−3
−4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+3367%
|
3−4
−3367%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 70−75
+3400%
|
2−3
−3400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+3133%
|
3−4
−3133%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+4200%
|
1−2
−4200%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 81
+3950%
|
2−3
−3950%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+3200%
|
1−2
−3200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 54
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+3129%
|
7−8
−3129%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+5800%
|
1−2
−5800%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+4200%
|
1−2
−4200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+3500%
|
3−4
−3500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+3350%
|
2−3
−3350%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+4800%
|
1−2
−4800%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 38
+3700%
|
1−2
−3700%
|
This is how GTX 1070 SLI and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1070 SLI is 3833% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1070 SLI is 5500% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 36.67 | 1.14 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
GTX 1070 SLI has a 3117% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% lower power consumption.
RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 6000 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
