Quadro P6000 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1050 1050 3 GB 1050 Ti 1060 3 GB 1060 3 GB GP104 1060 5 GB 1060 6 GB 1060 6 GB 9Gbps 1060 6 GB GDDR5X 1060 6 GB GP104 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 1070 1070 GDDR5X 1070 SLI 1070 Ti 1080 1080 11Gbps 1080 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with Quadro P6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
36.67
Quadro P6000
2016, $5,999
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
36.96
+0.8%

P6000 outperforms 1070 SLI by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1070 SLI GTX 1070 SLI
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.72
Power efficiency9.4611.44
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (10 years ago)1 October 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403840
Core clock speed1506 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data394.8
Floating-point processing powerno data12.63 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data240
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2" (5.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 8-pin
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5384 Bit
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1127 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 432 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Multi-display synchronizationno dataQuadro Sync II
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)no data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
High-Performance Video I/O6no data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
4K56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data54.54
4Kno data109.07

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+2.5%
200−210
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−0.8%
130−140
+0.8%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+2.5%
200−210
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Fortnite 280
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+5%
140−150
−5%
Valorant 220−230
+1.8%
220−230
−1.8%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−0.8%
130−140
+0.8%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+2.5%
200−210
−2.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−0.7%
280−290
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Dota 2 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Fortnite 176
+3.5%
170−180
−3.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+5%
140−150
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Valorant 220−230
+1.8%
220−230
−1.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
−0.8%
130−140
+0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Dota 2 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+5%
140−150
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Valorant 220−230
+1.8%
220−230
−1.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 123
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 250−260
+2.8%
250−260
−2.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+8%
50−55
−8%
Valorant 220−230
+2.7%
220−230
−2.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 100−110
+8%
100−105
−8%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and Quadro P6000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 7% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 36.67 36.96
Recency 16 August 2016 1 October 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 20% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and Quadro P6000.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P6000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q 2060 Max-Q
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GTX 1070 SLI
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 1070 SLI Mobile
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
Pro WX 4130 Pro WX 4130
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GTX 1070 SLI
vs
GTX TITAN BLACK TITAN BLACK
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
GT 740A GT 740A
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
HD Graphics 400 Graphics 400
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
FX 550 FX 550
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
7050 PV + nForce 630a GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
Xbox Series X GPU Xbox Series X GPU
GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4070 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 217 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 120 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or Quadro P6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.